<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Under Construction. No, Really.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://looneylisting.com/2015/09/18/under-construction-no-really/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://looneylisting.com/2015/09/18/under-construction-no-really/</link>
	<description>Weird Real Estate Listings and Strange Listing Photos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 05:36:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Hand ie andie		</title>
		<link>https://looneylisting.com/2015/09/18/under-construction-no-really/#comment-20489</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hand ie andie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 05:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://looneylisting.com/?p=6343#comment-20489</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I thought the same thing floor plan sucks for that kinda $$$]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the same thing floor plan sucks for that kinda $$$</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Emerald63		</title>
		<link>https://looneylisting.com/2015/09/18/under-construction-no-really/#comment-20478</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emerald63]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 21:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://looneylisting.com/?p=6343#comment-20478</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-20477&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Frodo&lt;/a&gt;: If not, it&#039;s gonna look like a set for a cheap cartoon flick.

See you in a couple weeks!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-20477" >Frodo</a>: If not, it&#8217;s gonna look like a set for a cheap cartoon flick.</p>
<p>See you in a couple weeks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Frodo		</title>
		<link>https://looneylisting.com/2015/09/18/under-construction-no-really/#comment-20477</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frodo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 17:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://looneylisting.com/?p=6343#comment-20477</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-20475&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Emerald63&lt;/a&gt;: I&#039;m thinking surely, for $1.5M they have better drawings than that somewhere. Or maybe the architect has restrictions on the plans.

I don&#039;t have any degrees in architecture, but I did product design for several years and generated shop floor and installation drawings from some of the most horrendous agent drawings you&#039;d ever want to see. So I&#039;m guessing these are not-to-scale agent sketches from copyrighted drawings.

I just wonder: if someone buys now do they get the option of calling some finishing shots before they install some crappy stuff in there?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-20475" >Emerald63</a>: I&#8217;m thinking surely, for $1.5M they have better drawings than that somewhere. Or maybe the architect has restrictions on the plans.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have any degrees in architecture, but I did product design for several years and generated shop floor and installation drawings from some of the most horrendous agent drawings you&#8217;d ever want to see. So I&#8217;m guessing these are not-to-scale agent sketches from copyrighted drawings.</p>
<p>I just wonder: if someone buys now do they get the option of calling some finishing shots before they install some crappy stuff in there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Emerald63		</title>
		<link>https://looneylisting.com/2015/09/18/under-construction-no-really/#comment-20475</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emerald63]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 06:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://looneylisting.com/?p=6343#comment-20475</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The house isn&#039;t the only thing that&#039;s not finished. As someone who spent 7 years earning 2 degrees in architecture I feel I have the right to say that that is one of the crappiest floor plans I have ever seen. Hell, they had auto-cad to help them do it and it&#039;s still crap. &lt;i&gt;&quot;In my day, we didn&#039;t have no fancy, high-falutin&#039; machines to do our draftin&#039; for us. We did our own damn draftin&#039; bent over a table for days on end and we &lt;b&gt;liked it&lt;/b&gt; that way!&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Um, no... actually drafting sucks, but still, if you want to present a decent representation of your design for the sake of those who, you know, aren&#039;t inside your head to see it like you do, you bother to make the effort to draft a readable plan with a good hierarchy of line definition, a suggestion of what furniture might inhabit the room as a means to show it&#039;s size, or where things like, say, toilets and bathtubs are. Kinda nice to know those are going to be included. 

I shudder to think (actually remember) what the reaction from design critics (aka profs) would&#039;ve been if I&#039;d shown up at a critique (aka design review) with the digital bar napkin doodle shown above. But I have to say, if I were the one handing out grades, I&#039;d give even a 5 year old an &quot;F&quot; for that &quot;effort.&quot; It&#039;s so bad, it&#039;s embarrassing to even look at. Apparently, professional pride has no meaning for some people.

......What do you mean, I may have some lingering &quot;issues&quot; about my school days? Huh.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The house isn&#8217;t the only thing that&#8217;s not finished. As someone who spent 7 years earning 2 degrees in architecture I feel I have the right to say that that is one of the crappiest floor plans I have ever seen. Hell, they had auto-cad to help them do it and it&#8217;s still crap. <i>&#8220;In my day, we didn&#8217;t have no fancy, high-falutin&#8217; machines to do our draftin&#8217; for us. We did our own damn draftin&#8217; bent over a table for days on end and we <b>liked it</b> that way!&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Um, no&#8230; actually drafting sucks, but still, if you want to present a decent representation of your design for the sake of those who, you know, aren&#8217;t inside your head to see it like you do, you bother to make the effort to draft a readable plan with a good hierarchy of line definition, a suggestion of what furniture might inhabit the room as a means to show it&#8217;s size, or where things like, say, toilets and bathtubs are. Kinda nice to know those are going to be included. </p>
<p>I shudder to think (actually remember) what the reaction from design critics (aka profs) would&#8217;ve been if I&#8217;d shown up at a critique (aka design review) with the digital bar napkin doodle shown above. But I have to say, if I were the one handing out grades, I&#8217;d give even a 5 year old an &#8220;F&#8221; for that &#8220;effort.&#8221; It&#8217;s so bad, it&#8217;s embarrassing to even look at. Apparently, professional pride has no meaning for some people.</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;What do you mean, I may have some lingering &#8220;issues&#8221; about my school days? Huh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
