This listing is for a 680 square foot, single-bedroom condo in what looks like a relatively small building.

I guess when you’ve only got 680 square feet to photograph, you get a little bored…

Who could have guessed that 3745 Harriet Ave S would be located at the corner of 38th & Harriet?

So, is the buyer of this condo required to perform the “revolutionary Cuban cooking,” or do they just have to smell it all day every day?

Huh. So 3745 Harriet Ave S has the numbers 3745 on it. Weird.

If you thought you were going to get any photos of this 672 square foot, 2 bedroom, 1 bathroom house offered for sale near Dallas for $70,000… You were wrong.

Instead, all you get is a picture of this portrait of an unknown lady.

The title of this post is taken from the listing description:

Be careful! Unlivable now. Extra large lot, 9 large oak trees make a perfect home site for living & entertaining. On the East & on the West, the homes are newer brick ones. Take this one; update it; maybe add on some square footage & you’ll have a wonderful home or a great flip. CAUTION: Be very careful – flooring is unstable & has trip hazards. Bring your flash light.

Good to know that there are 9 large oak trees. If a listing has any fewer than 7 I don’t even consider it.

This condo in Honolulu, Hawaii is just $28,000! According to the listing, it’s in a “great location.”

Just one problem…

Spacious storage room in great location, close to the entry door. Room for all of your lifestyle extras including golf clubs, Holiday decorations, Boogie boards, suitcases, and hobby materials. Lots of space, conveniently located, you’ll wonder how you got along without it!

Eighty-eight square feet. Zero beds. Zero baths. But hey, you can’t beat the price and the “great location.”

Apparently neither the seller nor the listing agent thought it worth $25 to buy a bucket of paint and cover the “art” in this home.

Asking price: $16,000. Last sold in 2004 for $58,500.

You’d probably have to pay me—and a lot more than $16,000—to live in Omaha.

This shot of the exterior brick wall isn’t the lead photo for this home, but it is the best photo.

The primary photo isn’t all that bad, but once you go inside… all bets are off.

I have to respect a listing agent that’s willing to brave such a terrifying environment just for the paltry commission they’ll be earning on a $15,000 listing.

How do homes even get like this?

Is that a toilet… in the bathtub? Never mind, I don’t want to know.

Missing windows with bird nests where the glass should be. Perfect.

How about I make you a deal. How about you pay me $15,000 and I’ll find a way to bulldoze this place to the ground and wipe its memory from the earth. That sounds pretty fair.

Ho-ho, no way am I going in there.

Oh. We went in there.

This place just keeps getting more and more nope.

How does this even happen.

Are those bars inside the windows? Yikes.

Okay so the list price on this… place in Jacksonville is under $20,000, so I wouldn’t expect much.

However, I do sort of expect that the agent could maybe be bothered to take a photo with a device made more recently than 20 years ago. Especially when they’re only going to bother uploading a single photo to the listing.

No such luck.

The listing agent selling this disused church building is apparently enamored with this sign.

Only 15 photos and three of them are progressively closer shots of the sign.

Okay, we get it. There used to be a church that met here.

List price: $15,000

The weird thing is that it doesn’t look that bad in the primary photo:

This is one of those instances when maybe everyone would have been better off (or at least had fewer nightmares) if the listing agent had only included a single photo.

Realtor: “Okay, if we’re going to sell this house, I’m going to need you to clean it up.”

Seller: “Umm…”

Realtor: “Well how about this. Can you at least mostly clear the floor middle of each room?”

Seller: “Umm…”